Advanced Archive Search >>

Most Popular

"Most Popular" tools sponsored by:

Recent Articles

Recent Articles by J. Hoberman

National Features >

  • Broward-Palm Beach New Times

    Sexual Healing

    For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.

    By Michael J. Mooney

  • City Pages

    Your Friendly Neighborhood War Profiteer

    It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.

    By Jeff Severns Guntzel

  • The Pitch

    Supersizing Sonic

    How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."

    By Justin Kendall

  • Houston Press

    Temples of Tex-Mex

    A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.

    By Robb Walsh

3:10 to Yuma: Russell Crowe Will Kill You and Your Entire Family

By J. Hoberman

Published on September 05, 2007

Huffing and puffing to resuscitate a long-moribund genre, James Mangold manages to imbue a 50-year-old Western with a semblance of life. Mangold's remake of 3:10 to Yuma sends a saddlebag full of Western tropes skittering into the 21st century. The original 3:10 to Yuma—newly remastered for DVD—was an "adult" Western, shot in black and white with a pair of second-tier stars, Glenn Ford and Van Heflin, as the charismatic outlaw and the beleaguered cattle rancher reincarnated in the remake by Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. Suspense trumped violence and chin music rivaled fisticuffs (much of the movie was confined to a single hotel room) as the rancher, not altogether willingly, assumed responsibility for ensuring that the outlaw boarded the train to the federal pen at Yuma. Mangold sticks close to Delmer Daves' 1957 version but, given an extra half-hour in which to play, opens up the original scenario to include a run-in with hostile Apaches and an interlude involving the construction of the train tracks. Back in the day, America used the Western to ponder certain things—among them the nature of right and wrong and the basis of the social contract. Mangold's movie is certainly louder in its ruminations than Daves', but the story still works.