What mainstream publishers don't want you to know about door-to-door magazine sales.
When these huntresses on are on the prowl, the prey very much wants to be caught.
How rumored McCain veep choice Charlie Crist wants to bail out Big Sugar.
Are Asian women getting their jawbones cut to look whiter?
The idea is to spice up Poppins with a bracing dash of Lemony Snicket wickedness and Roald Dahl's darkness risible. The reality sadly sags far short of that appealing idea. There is not one instant of freshness or surprise, no event not telegraphed centuries in advance. The kids' badness is too tame; it comes off as a sort of boring chore, not liberating, inspired insurrection. Nanny McPhee's imposition of order is too orderly by half. Since the original books apparently weren't big on plot, Thompson concocted one as mechanical as a computer game's. The kids must learn a numbered series of lessons, upon the completion of which Nanny loses one element of her ugliness—a mole per lesson learned.
Nanny strikes her stick to make magic happen, but it doesn't. Not-very-special special effects happen instead: Cheesy-looking donkeys dance; malingering kids find themselves physically and invisibly confined to bed. Thompson adds mean-spiritedness to the Poppins cliché without a trace of the spiritedness of more subversive reformers, like the aforementioned or the delightful heroine of Cold Comfort Farm.
Worse, Thompson plays every scene incredibly slow, particularly the ones starring her baleful stare. She's like a comic who waits 120 seconds too long to deliver a punch line. Part of the blame goes to director Kirk Jones (Waking Ned Devine), who was either in a deep doze behind the camera or paralyzed by genuflection before Thompson's Oscar-winning adaptation genius. The genius cast coasts in slow-mo to a foregone CGI conclusion. It's all shiny enough, and never dull. And never Dahl. (PG)