What mainstream publishers don't want you to know about door-to-door magazine sales.
When these huntresses on are on the prowl, the prey very much wants to be caught.
How rumored McCain veep choice Charlie Crist wants to bail out Big Sugar.
Are Asian women getting their jawbones cut to look whiter?
There's the ghost of a social critique: A boy grows up rich yet alienated thanks to suspicion of biraciality, MacArthur's child in an Americanized economy. But this is a magical fable, not dirty realism, and Tony Takitani and his dad (both played by Issey Ogata) are flickering figures of light projected onto drifty wisps of smoke. Tony works as hard as his dad worked at not working; he's a meticulous commercial illustrator, the opposite of a jazzman. He's got a particular gift for sketching machines, since that's what he is—a machine for producing glossy products and nameless anomie (cf. modern Japan).
Rich and lonesome, he hooks up with a young cutie (Rie Miyazawa) who's as blank a soul as he—she's a ghost wrapped in fancy clothes. Weirdly, her schmatte shopaholism obliquely causes catastrophe, so Tony replaces her with a Vertigo-like look-alike (also played by Miyazawa). This, too, ends in mysterious tears. In the end, though temperamentally his father's opposite, Tony ends up in the same place, existentially.
All this deterministic doubling sounds heavy-handed, but it's not. You never saw such exquisite lightness of touch. And yet I think the film inferior to Murakami's prose. It mutes a story—published in The New Yorker three years ago—that was nearly mute to begin with, in a way Lish-ifying it, reducing it to an essence that alters that essence. Inevitable with a film adaptation, and I haven't a clue how he might've done it better. Still, there it is: A Murakami story resonates, and Ichikawa's film—perfectly executed according to its own terms—does not. (NR)